Jeanne d'Arcs lidelse og død
When first
I saw ”La Passion de Jeanne d’Arc” a year ago I was disappointed. This is supposed
to be one of the best movies ever and by our own celebrity director Carl
Theodor Dreyer to boot so anticipation was high and of course impossible to
redeem.
Now I have
watched it a second time with much less anticipation and my view of it is a lot
more nuanced now. At least I can see where the acclaim comes from. I would not
say that I am sold, but I do like it better.
“La Passion
de Jeanne d’Arc” is a difficult movie to be critical about. In many ways it is
raised above criticism. I already mentioned the rating it receives in the
international community, but also the topic itself is fraught with controversy.
Jeanne d’Arc
is an official saint. Anybody criticizing her or anything relating to her is
messing with a major religion and everything relating to that in terms of hurt
sensibilities and religious dogma. Secondly she is a national hero in France
and no joking. I have been to Rouen and seen the monuments they made for her.
Even today she is a national symbol surpassing even Napoleon. When Dreyer wanted to make his Jeanne d’Arc
movie in France and a rumor was floating that Lillian Gish would play the part
of Jeanne d’Arc there was an outcry. A foreigner will make a movie with an
American as Jeanne d’Arc? God forbid!
Fortunately
it was not Lillian Gish who ended up playing Jeanne d’Arc but Renee Falconetti,
a theater actress with a much more naturalistic acting style.
So when I
say that “La Passion de Jeanne d’Arc” is not top rank I am sticking my neck
deep into a swarm of wasps. What I actually just mean is that an hour of
clerical interrogators questioning a girl following by 20 minutes of burning is
not really my idea of a good time.
But less
can do. Once you realize that not much more than this will happen you can go
into the details and there is quite a lot of reward there.
Jeanne d’Arc
has been captured by the English army during the hundred year war. In their
eyes she is an enemy general and a dangerous one at that because she can fire
up the local population of France with her religious and nationalistic fervor.
Therefore she must be eliminated and preferably in a way to deter any copycat
actions. As a court case the result is given in advance. She must die.
Therefore
it may seem odd that it is the church accusing her and making a lot of fuss out
of it. Why not just condemn her and be done with it? Because there is something
much much bigger at stake here.
The crisis
is on at least three levels.
Every party
going to war believes that God is on their side. In WWII the German soldiers
had written on their belts “Gott mit uns”. Then what about the other side? If
God is on our side He can hardly be on their side. Because if He is we have
chosen our side wrongly. Thus Jeanne d’Arc must be wrong. God cannot be allowed
to be seen fighting on the French side.
Secondly
the church deal in absolutes, at least in medieval times, but for many segments
of the religious community it is not so different today. There is one answer,
the right one, and everything else is false. It undermines the authority of the
church so any freethinker is quickly stamped a heretic and disposed of. Jeanne d’Arc challenges church dogma and is
dangerous and it is important that the public and the rest of the church reject
her.
Finally,
and that is the most interesting point and the one mostly explored in the
movie, there is a personal element. All these clerics have devoted their life
to a belief and Jeanne d’Arc is challenging it. If she is right then they are
wrong and they have been living a lie. We see the clerics react in different
ways to this challenge. Some are mocking her, refusing to consider the challenge.
Some are furious with her. It is terribly infuriating when somebody is trying
to pull the blanket from under you. It is a personal affront. And some are
doubting themselves, wondering if she is right after all and that they are
doing a terrible mistake. The inner battle is most visible on the older monk,
who was in the beginning engineering a trap for her, but later stands in the
doorway looking at her, his thoughts in turmoil.
So it is
very important that Jeanne d’Arc admits that she is wrong, that it was all just
some misguided girl confusing Satan with God. It is not enough just to burn
her.
And in this
endeavor they fail. Despite all the pressure and cunning and psychological terror
they inflict on her she cannot give up her belief and so she becomes a martyr
and in death she wins.
It is
difficult not to see a parallel to religious fanatics today who die for their
convictions with the rest of the world busy dismissing them as misguided fools.
And I will probably take a lot of heat for saying that, but the analogy is
there. Combining a religious and political agenda is dynamite, so while we see
all these clerics as sadistic hypocrites in some place we also understand them
because Jeanne d’Arc is dangerous and not just from their point of view. We
just happen to sympathize with her cause and her persona.
What Dreyer
achieves in his film is to focus entirely on this battle and does it by showing
the faces of people so close that we can see the wrinkles and the warts and all
the feelings and thoughts running through their heads. This is an angle we
rarely see in Jeanne d’Arc related movies and that is why this one is special.
If this is
your focus when watching it instead of expecting a popcorn flick then I will
grant that it is a good movie.
And then I forgot to mention that the soundtrack "The voice of light" is absolutely amazing.
I consider this to be the best silent drama that I have seen, so I'm glad you gave it a second chance. Yes, it's definitely not a "feel good" movie, but since it's based on real events at least you know that going in.
ReplyDeleteI too am quite happy I gave it a second chance. It did better for me this time round.
DeleteWhat I actually just mean is that an hour of clerical interrogators questioning a girl following by 20 minutes of burning is not really my idea of a good time.
ReplyDeleteBWA HA HA HA HA! I love it.
Yeah, I don't think this is really ANYONE'S idea of a good time. But it *is* a good film. Glad you gave it a second go around.
Some might find that stuff amusing...
DeleteYou have to know what you are going in for and be prepared for it. This is serious stuff.
I like this, but I feel like Dryer overly manipulates the audience with his lighting techniques and extreme close-ups. Falconetti never made another film after this, but her performance has been mimicked by other would-be cinema saints.
ReplyDeleteDreyer is not my favorite director. I know is his famous and all, but there is something introvert and manipulative in his movies I cannot come entirely to terms with. The Passion.. is his best movie by far.
Delete