Napoléon
We are back
in the department for heavily edited history lessons. You know, the very
patriotic kind where your heroes can do nothing wrong and those you do not like
range from being misguided sheep to demonic monsters. Judging from the list
this was a very common genre in those olden days with Eisenstein being maybe
the most famous example.
Now it is
the French’s turn to get a patriotic boost by celebrating their great hero
Napoleon. That the same Napoleon is reviled in almost any country outside
France is entirely beside the point. According to this history lesson he was
from childhood destined for greatness and without a miss headed straight for
the position as top dog in which function he saved the country, hurrah!
Okay, I am
mocking it. But this so shamelessly thickly done that it at times actually gets
funny. This dude never takes off his hat. He is wearing the classic Napoleon
hat even as a child and, say, 60% of the time we see him he is standing with
one arm on the back staring imperiously into the horizon. He is a caricature more
than a portrait really and the prime quality of the actor is that he looks like
him. Only when he gets involved with Josephine in the second half is he
starting to show traits different from stoic heroism and patriotism (and he
actually for ones take off his hat!.
The first
hour we can easily skip. Nothing much happens here except for establishing the
stereotype Napoleon. But that is okay, there is plenty of movie left, three
more hours to be precise. Abel Gance does not seem to deal in short flimsy
features.
But an hour
into the movie we get the first glimpse of what Napoleon, the movie, is famous
for: Napoleon’s wild ride across Corsica (being chased by soldiers with funny
hats) and subsequent escape in an open boat. When the speed picks up Gance shows
that he has learned something about filming and editing. The storm at sea
matching the storm in the French parliament is wild and crazy and woke me up
after almost drifting to sleep.
Throughout
the movie there are a number of these technical highlight. The storm of Toulon,
a ferocious battle at night in a storm, the subsequent storm in the parliament
during the reign of terror with everybody chopping off the head of everybody
else and to top it all Napoleon marching into Italy heading a grand army
covering three screens. Something for which my television is hopelessly
inadequate, but must have looked really awesome in the cinema and a fitting
reward for the audience who at this point would have sat through 3½ hours of
praise of all things Napoleon.
My personal
highlight was Robespierre. Gance equipped him with super cool sunglasses. In his
big white wig he looks ultra hipster with them and I got totally envious. I
hope to find a picture of it.
This movie
has many faults, but most of them are so obvious that I do not really have to
mention them. Suffice to say it is quite an ordeal to sit through it,
especially if you are not a French patriot. Cut down to half length it would
win a lot. Then it would fall into the category of technically brilliant pieces
of surreal propaganda (read: Eisenstein). Now instead it is a very very long technically
brilliant piece of surreal propaganda.
When
Napoleon raises his sail on his little boat, what does it look like? The
tricolore, of course!
I saw this one in a theater because it was the only way to see it. Looooooooooong. There were interesting parts, and, as you point out, Gance had improved his directing skills. I will say this for it, though. The finale with the triptych effect, the pseudo widescreen, that was pretty cool.
ReplyDeleteThere was an intermission, by the way. There has to be.
Still, how did you manage to sit through 4 hours of this in a cinema? I know I could not.
DeleteAs a Napoleonic scholar, I was not amused by this. I'm pretty sure there is no complete version of this--although Francis Ford Coppola did a restoration. So freaking long and boring, and the historical inaccuracies are criminal.
ReplyDeleteI doubt this is supposed to be historical. Instead its aim is to be patriotic and awe-inspiring. That was very much the general agenda in the twenties.
DeleteRenoir did a better movie on the revolution a decade later, perhaps you know it.
La Marseillais? It's much better than this, but Renoir was a much more gifted, and restrained, filmmaker than Gance.
ReplyDeleteThat is the one. It is almost as if Renoir saw "Napoleon" and thought: "Not like that!"
Delete