Queen Christina
I have
encountered three Greta Garbo films on the list. “Ninotchka” I already wrote
about and “Camille” is yet to come. The subject of the entry “Queen Christina”
is in my opinion the best of the three. In fact, having been through an entire
box set of Garbo films this one is the best of the whole lot.
This is in
no small part because the role as Queen Christina is as made for Garbo. She fit
it like she was born to it, something I cannot say about her character in
“Camille”. Queen Christina is haughty, powerful and dominating, but also
passionate and longing and these traits are all inherent in Garbo. Even when
the role does not require it she exudes these qualities. Not exactly the young
courtesan, but definitely the queen. Add to that that she is actually Swedish
and I could not imagine a better actress for the part.
She plays
alongside John Gilbert and that is a curiosity in itself. Gilbert starred some
early sound movies with sound quality so bad that he was libeled unsuited for
talkies and so like a dinosaur of a past age was destined to go extinct. His
heyday was with “The Big Parade” in 1925, but by 1933 he had become unwanted.
Garbo had a thing going with Gilbert and so insisted that he get the part as
Antonio. He proved that he was fully suited for talking pictures and does an
excellent job here, but alas it was too late. He soon succumbed to alcohol and
died in 36. It is not entirely unthinkable that the “The Artist” was modeled on
John Gilbert. Jean Dujardin even looks like John Gilbert.
“Queen
Christina” is a historic drama telling the story of legendary Queen Christina
of Sweden, particularly the climax around her abdication in 1654. As is always
the case with Hollywood interpretations of historic events the actual
circumstances have been pimped up, but in this case not as much as I would have
feared. I have checked a number of background details and they are surprisingly
correct. An example is that Christina rides for the border at the end of the
movie. My first thought was, aha, there is no border between Stockholm and
Helsingborg, but in fact there was. The peace agreement at Brømsebro in 1645
only gave Halland to Sweden, whereas Skåne where Helsingborg is located was
only ceded in 1658 in the Roskilde treaty. Christina did indeed leave Sweden by
the way of a ship in Helsingborg and it was no trivial affair for Swedish
royalty to cross through hostile Denmark to get to the ship. It would have been
easy to gloss over this, but the movie does not and I applaud it for it.
I have not
been able to verify if a meeting really happened at an inn with the Spanish
envoy shortly after his arrival, but he is a historic character and she was
indeed infatuated by him and created an order of knighthood around him. One of
the rules of the knighthood was to never get married. Christina herself was
indeed known for going around in men’s attire and a supporter of the arts. She
eventually ended up in Rome as a patron of the arts and is one of the few women
to have been buried in the Vatican crypt. Her weaknesses however are glossed
over. She was wasteful with resources as beside waging expensive wars she
doubled the nobility class in Sweden granting land and resources from the royal
coffers far beyond their capacity. Also she took little interest in the actual
ruling of the country leaving Axel Oxenstierna de facto ruler of Sweden. In
Garbo’s version she is entirely the responsible leader, not afraid to take
action, and very concerned with the costs of waging war.
Well, I
suppose I cannot blame director Rouben Mamoulian for embellishing the story.
For a movie from the 30’ies these modifications are quite modest.
Apart from
the historical element “Queen Christina” has number of interesting features. I
love the mistaken identity scene at the inn. The two peasants coming up to the
queen asking her to settle a wager: Did the queen have 6 or 9 lovers in the
past year? To which she declares that it was 12! How rare to have a female lead
brag of being quite a, well, stud. The play between Gilbert and Garbo is also
delicious both before and after he realizes she is actually a woman. And his
expression is priceless when he realizes he has been bedding the queen herself.
Although
the supporting cast appear rather wooden and theatrical they are still
believable, maybe because the scenery with them in the castle look like so many
old paintings. There is a certain tableau quality to the scenography.
Finally it
is refreshing with a female protagonist, especially one as strong as Garbo, not
a dainty flower to be tossed around but a force to be reckoned with. Too bad
that love is made to be her undoing. Such a character deserves better than a
cliché fate. Well, queen or not, to Hollywood she was first and foremost a
woman.
Excellent write up. I was completely surprised by this one--I expected nothing and got a compelling story with a fantastic female protagonist. Can't wait to see this one again.
ReplyDeleteYou should. I found it even better second time, now that I have had a chance to see some of Garbo´s other films. This is the best of them I think.
DeleteI have to agree that I've liked this the best of the Garbo films I've seen, although The Blue Angel is close. I do agree that several of the historical events are true, but I was disappointed to find out that the central romance story in the movie was entirely fictional, especially it being her reason for abdicating. I did like the scenes at the inn.
ReplyDeleteIs The Blue Angel with Garbo? I thought it was Marlene Dietrich. Maybe there are two movies with that name.
DeleteI am not sure the romance is entirely fictional. She seemed to have a thing going for Antonio.
Oops. Brain cramp on my part. Sorry for the confusion. Dietrich is right.
DeleteI recently started re-watching some of my favourite films from the 1001 list. I'm definitely putting this one on my list to re-watch.
ReplyDeleteYes, I can see you have dug into really early cinema lately. This one I was very happy to see again.
Delete