Vredens Druer
You know
those films that you fear seeing, with a story you are not sure you really want
to hear, but know you should and are awfully glad when you have because it was
an important story? “The Grapes of Wrath” is exactly that film. In a sea of
movies meant to please, this is the necessary one that tells the story you need
to hear, unpleasant as it is.
This is a
story of the Depression. Maybe even The Story of the Depression. But that does
not make it outdated at all, it is far too universal and particularly in this
day and age we can find large chunks of the story happening all around us. It
is awfully easy to close the eyes, but this is a movie to open them and hence
the discomfort.
John
Steinbeck’s legendary novel and John Ford’s equally famous picture from 1940 is
about the Oklahoma farmers that got rooted up by the dust bowl and speculation
and had to leave their homes for (rumors of) work in California. It is a tough
story where we follow a particular family who loses everything that does not
fit in their derelict truck and are reduced to be a scourge scorned by the
surrounding society. It strains the cohesion of the family, which slowly falls
apart. This is of course bad and the film is rightly praised for how well it
depicts what such a crisis does to people on a personal level.
What I see in
the film are the machinations of the crisis and the unfairness of it because
this is also a politically agitating story. Not the over-the-top propaganda of
Eisenstein, Bunuel or Riefenstahl, but the agitation you get when you reveal a
social injustice so rampant that you just got to do something about it. Because
very little if anything is exaggerated in this story, neither in the depiction
of the fate of the migrant workers of the thirties nor in the analogy to
migrant workers of today.
The Dust
Bowl was a natural disaster (severe drought) exacerbated by poor land
management (lack of shelterbelts and protection of topsoil) and combined with a
financial crisis forcing the owners of the land and the banks to squeeze
everything out of their assets including forcing tenants off the land. The
tenants had no security at all and none was available for them and soon many of
them were job and homeless. That sounds awfully familiar today in the present
financial crisis but even more so when you consider third world farmers leaving
their homes for the cities and wealthy western countries.
For the
Joad family there is nothing to do but to hit the road and that fact causes the
first casualty as grandpa Joad breaks down when they leave and never recovers. They
are a sorry bunch, but they have heard that work is available in California. Plenty
of work with generous pay, and so they are on their way. Again this sounds
awfully familiar. I have been around the world and heard what is said about
Europe and Scandinavia in particular. Many hopefuls out there buy into a
fantasy that does not exist and end up being very disappointed.
The Joads
cross the country and for a while the movie becomes a road movie, where we
cross our fingers that they will make it to the land of milk and honey. In the
eyes of the locals in the towns they pass through they are reduced to something
akin to vermin and treated as such. Only occasionally they are treated with
sympathy and respect even though they insist they are no beggars asking favors.
As they
reach California this sentiment becomes rampant. The Joads are not the only
Oklahoma farmers trying their luck in California and the invading horde is seen
as exactly that. To be contained and neutralized and preferably evicted. There
are camps (refugee camps) where the migrant families are setting up shanty
towns and they are generally considered a burden and a scourge. Except by the
ranchers and plantation owners who see the migrants as even cheaper labor than
the already available workforce. A labor force that will work without question
and can be abused at no costs. Which is exactly what is happening (again that
familiar ring), both to the Joads and to all the other migrant workers.
Obviously
the migrant workers are free game. They have absolutely no rights and no
protection although they deserve all our sympathy and help. They want to be
respected and live respectable life, but are treated as if undeserving of that.
The authorities in the form of the police is not protecting the migrants
against hostility and exploitation but instead enforce the blatant exploitation
and become a tool for the brutality and xenophobia of the locals. Any defense
of the migrants is considered communism and the work of “Red” (read
un-American) agents. It is this unfairness which is at the core of Steinbeck’s
and Ford’s story. These are fellow citizens. Just because they came on hard
times they deserve to be treated with respect and given an even chance.
The movie
gives its own (partial) solution in the form of the government camp where the migrants
are treated as humans. This gives them a chance to regain their self-respect
and treated well they behave well. With a flat command structure and a
collective responsibility this is very much a social-democratic solution and
part of the New Deal program that sought to alleviate the impact of the
depression. Here it comes as a Godsend and saves the family in their deepest
crisis.
This is a
film of epic format, both because of the story, but also in production; just
consider the sheer number of actors involved. The list of the cast just kept
rolling, not to speak of all the extras. Henry Fonda as Tom Joad makes his
character strong and wiry, but also a man of convictions who does what he got
to do. Yet it is Jane Darwell as Ma Joad who steals the picture. She is very
much the character that glue the group together, the epicenter around which the
story progresses. And she does it with conviction and a realism that not for a
second we doubt that she is the character. Only later as I started writing did
I realize she got an Oscar as supporting actress. It is so very well deserved
and the only surprise is that she did not get it for best actress. There is no
other woman above her in this movie.
Migrant
workers of the world, unite and take over!
Good review, especially with the hitting the details of a bad time in U.S. history. There are plenty of Americans that could probably not have explained the background of that situation.
ReplyDeleteI agree on both Fonda and Darwell. They really make the picture.
If you want to see another film that deals with some of this same issue, then check out Bound for Glory (1976). I saw it a few months back because it was an Oscar Best Picture nominee. It tells the story of folk singer Woody Guthrie before he was famous. Part of it deals with his similar trip from Oklahoma to California in the 1930s and his growing desire to help the workers protest their situation.
What stroke me with this movie is how universally true it is. It is telling the story of Oklahoma farmers going to California, but it could just as well have been illegal immigrants working in the US, Chinese migrant workers in Beijing or Shanghai, Africans working in Spain or Greeks working in Denmark. Or any other historic reference. They all apply and they are all telling the same fundamental story and that is one (among other) reasons "The Grapes of Wrath" works perfectly well today. It did not feel dated at all.
DeleteI will check out Bound for Glory. It sounds very interesting. I am usually not into political or social indignation films, but this is an interesting story.
Nice review.
ReplyDeleteThis film, coupled with the sheer volume of other films that Hollywood made about the Great Depression while it was still going on, made me really appreciate the vast scope of the effect it had on America. I never *really* grasped just how devastating it was until I watched the films from the era, and heck, I even read "Grapes of Wrath" in high school.
And yeah, Fonda is amazing.
Yes, this one in particular carries an impact. So far this is the most ruthless and honest portray of the Depression age I have seen and it will be hard to top.
Delete