Madame bliver forelsket
After a
swath of social critique films with a slant on the heavy side I finish this Christmas
special with a film much more suited for a New Year celebration. Away with all
the concerns of the world, let us delve for a time in the world of the rich and
careless, where you can get away with the most outrageous scams and laugh all
the way to the bank.
“Trouble in
Paradise” has to be one of the most charming films on the list. It is so difficult
not to love it. I found myself chuckling all the way through it. Not
slapping-my-knee-laughing, but a quiet chuckle and a big smile. It is that kind
of movie.
It is a
scam/heist story and so fall into a category that has been explored to death
over the years. Usually their quality has been the complexity (Oceans Eleven),
the action (The Italian Job), the comedy (The Pink Panther) or the insanity (A
Fish Called Wanda). In the case of “Trouble in Paradise” the quality is Charm
(capital C!). I just do not recall a more charming set of characters than what
we get here.
Gaston
Monescu (Herbert Marshall) and Lily (Miriam Hopkins) are high society crooks
who use their very well developed charm to insinuate themselves into the
confidence of the rich and the über-rich and get away with a lot of money.
Usually. The opening of the film is the story of how they met in Venice,
pretending to be a baron and a countess and intending to rob each other. They
succeed outrageously, revealing each other as crooks to their mutual pleasure.
They draw out items they have plundered from each other and climax gloriously
when he take out her garter. You just have to wonder how that happened, wink
wink.
In Venice
we are also introduced to one half of the comedic sidekick, Francois Filiba (Edward
Everett Horton). He and the Major (Charles Ruggles) are excellent all the way
through. In Venice he has been robbed of 20.000 franc by Monescu, pretending to
be a doctor examining his tonsils. We get a glorious scene where he is trying
to explain the incident to the local Italian police. Every (short) explanation
he gives becomes loud, elaborate and very heated in translation and the
agitated discussions result in simple, short questions. This is of course a
comedic jab at the Italians, but I can testify that it is exactly how it is
working in Italy. Everything takes twice as long and requires at least 10
decibels extra to explain in Italian.
But I am
digressing. The core story is about Monescu and Lily trying to rob the rich
(and stunningly beautiful) widow Madame Colet (Kay Francis), owner of Colet and
Company (perfumes), for a fortune. Using his extraordinary charm Monescu very
quickly becomes Madame’s secretary and confidant with a love affair brewing on
the horizon. Meanwhile Monescu and Lily, passing as Monescu’s (or La Valle as
he calls himself) secretary, are arranging for 850.000 francs to be placed in
her mansion, ready for the taking.
While
Madame Colet is totally taken by Monescu there are a number of people who are
less impressed. The aforementioned Francois Filiba and the Major are both
courting Madame and fighting a hilarious battle to get her attention while
discrediting each other. Both are way below her (and Monescu’s) standard which
they eventually realize at which point they become allies against this greater
threat. Filiba is almost remembering where he has seen Monescu before and his
attempts at recollection are a highlight in itself. He will show up, stand
there with a puzzled expression and then withdraw with an even more puzzled
expression. And you know that the moment he remembers the scam will come
crashing down around Monescu’s and Lily’s ears.
Also the
chairman of the board of directors Monsieur Adolphe Giron is unhappy about the
new secretary. For years he has been getting away with embezzling millions, but
a crook recognizes another crook and Monescu catches him with the fingers in
the cake box just as Giron uncovers Monescu’s real identity.
But the
greatest threat to the scam is Monescu himself. Or rather Madame Colet, because
the charm is mutual and they fall in love in each other to the chagrin of
everybody else including his partner Lily. So besides being a scam story it
also becomes a saucy love triangle drama.
I will not
reveal here how it all works out, but the keyword is charm. Full throttle,
overdrive charm.
A winning
feature of this picture is that I love all the characters. Lily is so sassy,
Colet is stunning, absolutely stunning and Filiba and the Major are priceless.
My only problem is Herbert Marshall himself. He is so over the top sleek and
suave that he gets sticky. With his sleek hair and immaculate suites and a
demeanor of the most exquisite connoisseur I would run away screaming. Of course
it was a different age and I am not a woman, but really? Isn’t he just a bit
too much? He is totally charming however and he does win me over as well so I
root for him, but he does make Pierce Brosnan’s James Bond look like an
uncultured hobo.
If you are
planning a romantic New year’s eve in the company of two you should NOT watch a
movie. If you did however, you could do worse than picking “Trouble in Paradise”.
I agree with most everything you wrote here. I saw this film a few weeks ago and it is one of my favorite movies I've seen this month. It wouldn't be long before the Production Code would make it impossible to make films like this again for decades.
ReplyDeleteNo, with all the thinly veiled sexual references this would raise the red flag big time once the Hays Code got in place.
DeleteI completely agree with you; the movie is so much fun. It's COMPLETELY fantasy, but that's the fun. And I'm very much in agreement regarding rooting for everybody. There are no losers in this film.
ReplyDeletePs - I like your little comment at te end about spending NewYears with your partner. It made me laugh. As did the James Bond comparison to Herbert
Well, I can tell you that my wife, son and I are spending our new years eve very very far from any tv set. No films for us.
DeleteIt is really a film where you sit back with a big smile on your face. I love it.
We disagree about Marshall's Monescu and Hopkins' Lily. I much prefer his charm to her irritating mannerisms. It bothers me to no end that Kay Francis got the short end of the stick.
ReplyDeleteYes, Kay Francis deserved better, yet I cannot really feel bad about this movie. It is a gem.
DeleteI was not really bothered by Hopkins, she had a tall task playing up against Marshall and I think she did quite allright. I wished however that Marshall would tone it down a bit, but that is probably a product of the time.