Udflugt med døden
A bunch of
guys go on a survival trip that does not exactly pan out as expected. Does that
sound familiar?
I do not
know how many versions of this tale I have watched over the years, but they all
have gotten blurred together. Some are good, some a wacky, even crazy and some
are very disturbing. I seem to recall watching something with Kevin Bacon some
time ago… Anyway, the mother of these adventure gone wrong movies is “Deliverance”
by John Boorman.
Four city-dwellers
from Atlanta heads into the backcountry to ride down a wilderness river before it
will be drowned by a dam. These four guys want to do this in two canoes, but
are clearly very unfamiliar with the river and population of the region around
the river.
Lewis (Burt
Reynolds) is the survivalist enthusiast who came up with this idea. He is on
his own little Rambo trip and clearly gets a kick out of this. The other three
are Ed (Jon Voight), Bobby (Ned Beatty) and Drew (Ronny Cox). They are merely
passengers on this stunt, sceptic, but playing along.
In typical
arrogant city-dweller style, they treat the local hillbillies with (a perhaps
deserved) contempt and completely underestimate the rapids of the river. Soon
both will (literally) screw them over and getting out of this alive is all they
can hope for. Unscathed they are not.
On the
positive side, there is some pretty amazing photography here. The river is
dramatic and the ride down the rapids is exactly as exhilarating and wild as
you could hope for. In fact, that river is pretty insane and the idea that this
natural marvel should be swallowed by a dam in nothing short of criminal. As a
critique of environmental sabotage, it works. As a comment on human folly in
challenging nature it also scores points. The arrogance of these people evaporates
completely as they realize their own inadequacy.
What works
less well is the guilt trip. It was a super bad idea to go on this canoe ride
with no respect for the terrain and I understand that there is a collective
guilt over what happens to Drew. Yet, the movie spends a lot of energy on
remorse and guilt over what happens to the hillbillies. I will not spoil the
movie with too many details, just say that given the situation they were put in
by the hillbillies there was little else they could do. According to Hollywood
morality it would be almost a crime not to do what they did with them. Yet, for
half the movie these guys are consumed with guilt to the exclusion of all else,
not for going on the river in the first place, not blaming Lewis for setting
this up or for Drew and his family, but for what happened to the hillbillies.
One thing
is that it is difficult to work out, another is that it totally eats the last
third of the movie. When they finally get out of the water, I expected the
movie to end and that was it, but instead we get a very protracted Lord of the
Rings size ending focusing singularly on this guilt trip.
My experience
with this movie was therefore a mixed one. There were great parts but what
happened on the river, the actual drama, fills relatively little compared to
their dealing with the trauma and to me it simply veers off in a strange
direction.
Also, it
must deduct that the production company wanted to cut cost and have the actors
do their own stunts. That is pretty irresponsible.
It is a
moderate recommendation from me.
Your review brought it all back to me.
ReplyDeleteOne of my favorite college professors studied with James Dickey, the author of the source novel for this movie. He would always show Deliverance at some point in his courses. So I've seen the movie several times. It is quite powerful but there was no way I was going to watch that rape yet again. My favorite part of the movie by far is the "Duelling Banjos" sequence.
Thank you.
DeleteI think the rape scene is fairly short (but important). The canoe ride itself is actually worth the admission, it is pretty wild.