Mig og fremtiden
With “Sleeper”
I have arrived at the first Woody Allen movie on the List. I have not checked
but I got the feeling there are quite a few of his movies coming up. Woody
Allen is one of those directors, like Roman Polanski, whose movies you
seemingly cannot discuss without also discussing the person, so let me just get
that off my chest right away. I do not really care what sort of weirdo a guy
may be or whether or not he may or may not be guilty of something. It is the movie
I am looking at, that is all I really know and all I can talk about.
With that
out of the way, let me continue being general and confess that Woody Allen’s
schtick never really worked for me. His little, neurotic New Yorker is missed
on me and the movies of his I like the best are those without him acting or at
least staying in the background. It is not a dislike, I am just sort of
indifferent to his typical character.
This is a
problem when watching “Sleeper” because this is very much about Allen doing his
thing and a lot of the comedy is dependent on that.
In “Sleeper”
Miles (Allen) is a musician and owner of a health food store in New York (of
course), who in 1973 went to hospital for a simple procedure, got frozen down
and revived 200 year later. The doctors have to keep him hidden because they
want to use him for a covert operation against the dictatorship they live in
and soon he is on the run in a world he does not understand. This is all played
out as slapstick comedy a la Chaplin or Keaton, complete with ragtime music and
sped-up chases. Miles is a clown and everything he touches is a mess. The
police, however, is not much better.
One of the
novelties of 2173 is the butler android. Miles has an early encounter with one
of these and escaping in a butler robot supply van he disguises himself as a
butler robot. In this function he starts working for Luna (Diane Keaton), a
snobbish artist who is not terribly bright. As a butler, Miles is a disaster
and Luna wants his head replaced. Hilarity ensues and soon Miles is on the run
again, this time with Luna in tow.
Everything
here aims for comedy and this follows two tracks, the physical slapstick comedy
and the little, neurotic New Yorker comedy and it plays both hard. The first
actually has its moments, but Allen is not Chaplin or Keaton, and it is in
general played too hard. My son would probably find it more to his taste. The other
line, well, if you like Allen’s schtick…
I do not
mind silly comedies, I laugh myself silly to Naked Gun or Airplane!, but it does
not work too well for me here. I am also losing tough with a story which is, I think,
more interesting than Allen’s comedy. There is a lot of Tati here, the bafflement
with technology and the alienation caused by technology and modernity. Tati
just does it a lot better. This ties in with a criticism of conformity and
government control, which is very early-seventies. Yet all I get from the movie
is that Woody Allen wants to be Chaplin.
I am likely
the wrong audience for this movie, and would not be surprised if I stand alone
on this. It is interesting to see what Woody Allen did in his early years, but
otherwise I will leave it to Allen fans to give their appraisal for “Sleeper”.
Woody Allen doesn't become a director I admire until Annie Hall and beyond. His sillier films are a mixed bag for me. I find him trying to play the cello in a marching band hilarious but other gags don't work as well. You may be right about this appealing more to kids but then there's all that sex humor. Fortunately, it's of the sort that probably go over most pre-teen heads.
ReplyDeleteThat is a strange combination: a silly slapstick humor that is rather childish and the advanced neurotic New Yorker schtick which is definitely adult. I am not certain what to make of this movie.
DeleteI did watch some Woody Allen in the past, but it has never been something I have sought out. My favorite is Midnight in Paris and that one he is only directing.