Barry Lyndon
I am not
certain what to think of “Barry Lyndon.
When I
found that a Stanley Kubrick was coming up, I was very excited. Kubrick usually
does not let me down and no two of his movies are alike. In that was he is
literally the opposite of Hitchcock.
Secondly, “Barry
Lyndon” is a period film, taking place in the eighteenth century. I do read a
lot of books from that period, and it is exciting to get some images to go with
the stories, so definitely a plus.
Yet,
watching it I am a bit at a loss. I simply do not understand what story it is
Kubrick is trying to tell.
What he
does spend three hours on is a story about a young man (at least in the
beginning), Redmond Barry (Ryan O’Neal), who through odd turns in life ends up
a nobleman, only to squander it all away again. Redmond is not a hero or even
an anti-hero. He is kind of an asshole, not terribly smart and making bad
choices on a regular basis. Such as hitting on his cousin, a know flirt, and sabotaging
her marriage to a wealthy army captain. He has loyalty to no-one but himself, which
we see several examples of as he joins the army fighting in Germany. In Prussian
service he becomes an agent, then a double agent, then, escaping the Prussians he
goes around swindling the wealthy with his compatriot. Until he makes his big
move and court Lady Lyndon (Marisa Berenson), a countess.
Marriage is
for Redmond merely a ticket to wealth, style, more women and spending money.
Soon he has spent the fortune, alienated his wife and her son and disgraced himself
to his new peers and he is left with nothing, not even his leg.
There is
definitely a picaresque element to the movie. Redmond drifts from one situation
to the next without a larger plan, but merely reacting to the situation at
hand. He is an opportunist, but for short term gains, and he rarely seems to
think his actions through. This makes his life a pretty random affair with many
stops on the way.
I cannot
root for Redmond. For Redmond there is only Redmond. That makes it somewhat
hard to watch the movie. In the beginning I am sitting with a hope that through
his adventures he will mature, but he is a lost cause and by the end I just
feel sorry for his victims. Except that all these dandies and coxcombs have it
coming.
So, I am left
a bit perplexed. Kubrick always had a point, but what was his point with Remond
Barry? To showcase an asshole and see him get what he deserves? Hardly, but
then what? The randomness of life when you think with your gut rather than your
brain?
Nothing,
however, can take away the pleasure of watching the settings, the magic light
and the authentic costumes. The cinematography is just stunning, maybe the most
beautiful I have seen from Kubrick. It is matched by a magical score of classic
music. A lot of baroque, but also more contemporary Handel and Mozart and even
some Schubert, which is actually a bit ahead of this period of second half of
the eighteen century. The Handel score used as the recurrent theme is perfectly
moody and magic.
A technical
wonder of a movie, but a not very sympathetic story where I feel I am missing
the point. I feel I have been here before, but then I am not very smart.
I could
definitely listen to that score again, though.
Yes, I agree that the film is weaker than others on the list and even some that are not on the list.
ReplyDeleteIndeed, but it is still a beautiful movie.
Delete