Postbudet Ringer Altid To Gange
“The
Postman Always Rings Twice” from 1946 is probably the most famous movie based
on James M. Cain’s novel of the same name. It is a decent film, but will in my
book necessarily be compared to the other movie based on this book from the 40’ies:
The Italian “Ossessione”.
Where most
people probably knew “The Postman…” long before they saw (if at all) “Ossessione”
it is opposite with me. “The Postman…” will therefore necessarily be measured
against that standard.
The first
and maybe most notable difference is the style. “The Postman Always Rings Twice”
is made in classic film noir style. It has that dark foreboding feeling, the
inevitable tragedy as well as the alluring femme fatale and the narration in
flashback. It reminds me in many ways about “Double Indemnity”, which
incidentally is another James M. Cain novel. The major difference is that the
two leads in “The Postman…” are not cold, cynical experts at the top of their
game, but emotional amateurs who manage to botch it up pretty well. I am a big
fan of film noir and while this one is not bad it just not half as impressive
as the pre-neorealism of “Ossessione”.
Where the
cast of “Ossesione” feels like real people “The Postman…” look staged. There is
a certain theater element, which is typical of Hollywood of that age and
usually fine with me, but which “Ossessione” has thrown altogether. It is
unfair, I know, but when every scene for the first hour of “The Postman” has an
Italian parallel it is difficult not to compare.
In “The
Postman Always Rings Twice” the drifter arriving at the gas station is Frank
Chambers (John Garfield). A dude with some rough edges, but overall more likeable
than Gino. This is mainly because of his apologetic innocence. We are led to
know that he is essentially a good guy. What he does, he does for love. In a
pinch he will do the right thing, whatever “right” means. Unfortunately that
also means that he is almost entirely lacking the feral masculinity and
magnetism of Gino. Where we believe Giovanna is swept off her feet by Gino, I
get the impression that Cora is exploiting Frank the boy.
Cora (Lana
Turner) may have been a hottie back in 46, but to me she looks all plastic. She
has the allure of a Barbie doll, which compared to Giovanna’s sensuality is
rather shallow. She is the petulant child who got stuck on a gas station with
her old fart of a husband and is now looking for a new plaything. Both women
want to get away, to be more than they are stuck as they are in their lives and
both use the drifter as leverage. Here again I am being terribly unfair. Visconti
did not have to struggle with the production codes and could do things on film
that an American director in the forties could only dream of. Visconti could
show sexual tension, where Tay Garnett, the director of “The Postman…” would
have to rely on a colder and more subtle passion. That is done with some vamp
looks from Cora and lopsided smiles from Frank and by declaring their love
again and again. Unfortunately I do not really believe them. They are having so
many doubts and throw so many accusations at each other, especially in the
second hour that the entire film could have been resolved by one person walking
out on the other. There are no children between them (until the end) and the
bonds that bind them are tenuous at best. I am simply missing a good reason for
these people to stay together.
The third
violin, Cora’s older husband, the proprietor of the gas station is almost a
clone in the two movies. A friendly older man without a clue what is going on
between his wife and the hired hand. Both men even have an affinity for music.
A difference however is how our impression of him changes through the film.
Giuseppe starts out loud and boisterous, but reveals a sympathetic side as the
movie progresses. Nick (Cecil Kellaway) on the other hand starts out as the
friendly and innocent old man, but reveals a total disregard for the feelings
of people around him, which makes him appear cruel. The result is that while in
“Ossessione” we realize what a horrible thing it was to kill Giuseppe, “The
Postman…” almost makes us feel that Nick had it coming. As a consequence Giovanna
and Gino’s fate feels like God’s wrath, while Cora’s and Frank’s merely feels
like the punishment for botching up the whole thing.
Where the
two films are entirely parallel for the first hour they then depart in a big
way. “The Postman…” develops into a courtroom drama that can only be described
as a farce. Now, I am not a fan of courtroom dramas. In fact I tend to avoid
them. But this one actually appealed to me in its absurdity. What looks like a
clear case of conviction, punishment and end turns out to be a sporting event
between two lawyers too smart for their own good and the entire court cased
flies by while we along with Cora and Frank are looking from the sideline with
a gaping mouth and incomprehension in the eyes. What on Earth just happened?
From this
point we get to see how unstable Cora is and how innocently naïve Frank,
despite his tough demeanor, is. Cora responds to every event with wild
flamboyant excesses of emotion and is busy digging their own grave. Frank is
just standing there trying to make sense of it. Yes, there is also an insurance
claim, but here the two films differ again. The insurance money was the real
objective for Giovanna. She coldly manipulated everybody, particularly Gino, to
get those money. Cora was not even aware of the claim. People around her think
the money was her motive, while really she was just trying to avoid ending up
nursing a paralyzed old woman in Northern Canada (which incidentally is very
funny. That was a laugh when Nick declared his plan for her).
Finally in
the end the storylines are meeting again. Giovanna and Cora are pregnant and
both couples have finally made up when the postman rings the second time. I do
not know how many times I have wondered at drivers in movies who are able to
look at their fellow passenger for extended periods without any consequence to
their driving. I have kept telling myself that this will end badly but it never
does. Hollywood drivers do not really have to look at the road to drive a car
and they can certainly kiss and drive. So it seems almost an intertextuality
when it is exactly in such a situation that fates hit Cora and Frank. To me it just
underlines the impression that Giovanna and Gino may have been hit by the wrath
of God, but Cora and Frank managed to botch it up pretty well themselves.
This is not
a bad film. Ultimately I just liked “Ossessione” better.
We have opposite opinions on this. I like this version better in no small part because it's more streamlined.
ReplyDeleteHowever, it's worth noting that I saw this one first, just as you saw Ossessione first. That may be clouding both of our opinions.
Well, I am looking forward to read your review of it. You are probably right, that the first film you see sets the standard. John Garfield I will admit is a plus, simply because he is more likable, but in this case passion is needed and there he is sorely lacking.
DeleteI'm a fan of the Italian version--it's much grittier and less studio-esque. By the way, I agree with your statement, Cora and Frank were a product of their own stupidity.
ReplyDeleteI have started watching a lot of Italian neorealism and I have come to admire the style. It may be less studio, but not less dark and gritty. It is like somebody is moving the camera away from the stage and crying; see, it is just as dark and dramatic in reality.
DeleteI really wanted Frank to just walk out on her. She is a ticking bomb and he is the worse for staying.
I also saw Ossessione first and prefer it. There is something somehow sanitized about the American version and Lana Turner doesn't seem smart enough to be a schemer. Also Hardwicke was a shocker. So different from the "greasy Greek" of the novel.
ReplyDeleteNo, Cora was a bit of a disappointment. She is not evil, just stupid and very impulsive.
DeleteI never read the book, but having watched two movies on the story, maybe it is time. I have started getting classics on audiobooks. It is lazy, but fun.
The version narrated by Stanley Tucci is very good. It's a novela really, less than three hours long. I listen to most of the books I read these days. I do a lot of knitting while watching movies and "reading".
DeleteI will add it to the list. I have a queue of Chandler books waiting for me already.
DeleteI definitely need to move Ossesione up on my to see list.
ReplyDeleteI really do like Postman, though can anything in this genre possibly top Double Indemnity?
Ossessione is definitely worth a view. I think it is superior to The Postman..., but that is a matter of taste. The only problem with Ossesione really is that none of the characters are particularly likable.
DeleteI actually was not knocked over by Double Indemnity at first. It took some time. now I consider it an excellent film, but there is an entire crowd of excellent film noir around from this period.