Cykeltyven
Welcome to
1948. The first film of this interesting year is “Ladri di Biciclette” or “Bicycle
Thieves”, a movie whose acclaim has not gone unnoticed. This is a movie I have
heard of even before I started this project, though I never saw it before now,
and it has won a number of international prices including an Academy Award for
Best Foreign Language Film.
I am not
surprised really. This is an amazing movie
I should at this point warn that this review
contains massive spoilers. If you have not seen it read no further. Do not get
your experience tempered by me revealing the ending. Just go see this film,
please.
Now that
you have seen the film there is little point in me summarizing the plot. You
know that this is essentially a film about a father and his son desperately
looking for a stolen bicycle.
There is a
lot of excellent stuff in this film.
The first
item I noticed is how real the film is. Okay, duh, this is Italian neo-realism.
It is supposed to be realistic. But “Ladri di Biciclette” takes realism to a
new level. People act and talk like they would in reality. Gone is the stylized
and cool dialogue or the tough guy act. These are people who act out of need
and do what anybody would do in such a situation. Antonio Ricci (Lamberto
Maggiorani) needs a job badly because he has a family to take care of. His
wife, Maria Ricci (Lianella Carell) sacrifices the bed sheets because they are
in this together and if the job requires a bike then it is essential to get it
back from the pawn shop. When the bike is stolen it is just really bad luck,
you cannot even blame Antonio for not locking it. He does not return directly
to Maria because he feels he has let her down. This must somehow be fixed
before he can face her. When she appears she is more interested in solutions
than throwing up a melodramatic tantrum. This is their future as a family which
is at stake.
It is this
behavioral pattern that is so familiar and recognizable from ourselves that
makes this film so relevant for us. In this day and age a stolen bicycle would
hardly be a crisis, certainly not of this magnitude, but these characters (and
the direction of course) make it very real. Frankly, when his bike got stolen I
was devastated although I knew it was coming. I had to take a little break to
recover.
What do you
do in such a situation Antonio finds himself in? What can you really do? You
can go to the police, but they could not care less. There are more important
things for them to do than look for stolen bicycles. That has not changed
since. Antonio does the only thing he can do, he go out to look for the bicycle
himself. It is hopeless of course, Rome is a big city and in 1948 bicycles seem
to be the mode of transportation. Even though he do find the thief, which is
quite an achievement, it helps him zip. No proof, no bicycle, no witnesses and
it is clear that the bicycle thieves are an organized lot. That bicycle is gone
and so it the job that Antonio and Maria had hinged their future on.
Had this
been a contemporary Hollywood production Antonio would have found the bicycle
somehow, probably in some miraculous coincidence, or some other opportunity
would have appeared, but that is hardly realistic, is it? What is realistic is
what this sort of desperation drives a man to do. He tries (and fails) to
forget his misfortune, what else is the visit to the restaurant? He hopes for
some divine intervention and that is as useless as ever, and eventually he
succumbs to the worst of all. Giving up his principles and become thief
himself. Another devastating moment.
In all this
I have not mentioned another truly amazing element to the movie: Bruno Ricci (Enzo
Staiola), Antonio’s little son. Enzo was 8 years at the time of filming and
Bruno is supposed to be 7-8 years old. Normally I dislike children in older
movies. They tend to come about fake and staged, but not Bruno. He is
absolutely adorable and more importantly, the father – son relationship is just
perfectly heartbreaking. This relationship, how it works through the crisis,
the respect, love but also friction is maybe even more important than the
search for the bicycle. Although the movie ends on a downbeat it also ends with
father and son reunited and more together than ever. When Bruno smiles I am
happy. When Bruno is missing I worry, when Bruno cries “Papa” and runs to his
father my heart is overflowing. That is how good this film works and why it is
tearing me apart. Oh, Bruno’s disbelief when he sees his father stealing a bike…
In the
extra-material Vittorio De Sica says
that neo-realism was not a conscious effort to do exactly that. The neo-realists
after the war set out to find the truth, not realism. Film can never be real,
but film can be true. I think there is a lot of right in that. I felt watching
this film that it was true.
Bonus
detail: The poster Antonio is putting up is a poster for the movie “Gilda”.
Funny, but also symbolic. “Gilda” in the world of “Ladri di Biciclette” is
fiction.
Excellent point about the difference between real and true. I agree that this film is very much true, and that's where all of its power comes from. This is another film in a long list of films that I'm happy I saw and am not sure I will ever watch again. It's just too gutting.
ReplyDeleteIt is gutting indeed. As good as it was it left me depressed for an entire day. I just could not let the movie go.
DeleteI've always felt a little strange about talking about this film because the very title itself already spoils the ending of it (see also: Kill Bill). It did for me anyway and that was back when it was being called "The Bicycle Thief" in English. There's not much suspense about who the thief in the title is going to be. Now they've changed the title to "Bicycle Thieves" to seemingly remove any chance of not giving away the ending. Now the title tells us there's not one thief, but two.
ReplyDeleteOn an unrelated note, the 2012 film A Better Life, which earned Demian Bichir a Best Actor Oscar nomination, is an uncredited remake of Bicycle Thieves, with the illegal immigrant Mexican father searching with his son for his work pickup truck that was stolen from him and which he needs to earn a living in his gardening job in the U.S.
I knew Antonio's bike would be stolen, but I was hoping against hope that he would eventually find it again. I kept looking at the clock...10 minutes left, 5 minutes left... He WILL find it, will he not? But he did not, and that is I suppose the meaning of the plural in the titel.
DeleteI have not seen the other film. Maybe I should.
This film is both true and real ... and beautiful. I really liked your review.
ReplyDeleteThank you very much. It has a true ring to it. That is why it works so well. This is also why I find that I appreciate Italian neo-realism.
DeleteI would never in a million years say that this film isn't worthy of its place in history...
ReplyDelete... but you will have to tie me down to force me to watch it a second time.
Why?
Because I honestly don't think I have the emotional stamina to be put through the ringer a second time. This film is JUST TOO MUCH for me. It's SO sad. It's what I call a "hide the razors" movie.
Definitely a masterpiece, etc. Never going to begrudge it that. But I don't think I have it in me to go through this emotional trauma twice.
Yes, this is more or less how I feel about it. It is a devatating film to watch, but I am very glad I saw it. It is a movie that made me think a lot and that is usually a good sign, though the thoughts were mostly depressive...
DeleteOne of the greats.
ReplyDeleteAlso fitting that Robert Altman used Bicycle Thief as the movie within a movie that the director played by Tim Robbins watched in The Player before his confrontation with the aggrieved writer.
There is another great movie that I have yet to see.
DeleteI am not surprised that the Bicycle Thieves made a big splash. it deals a mighty blow.