Hemmeligheden bag døren
”Secret
Beyond the Door” would have been the result if Val Lewton had decided to
produce a mix of ”Rebecca” and “Spellbound”.
Okay, this
is not a Val Lewton film, but a film directed and produced by Fritz Lang. That
does not change that this is a film with some serious referencing issues. I can
almost imagine Lang watching “Rebecca” and thinking: “So ein muss ich auch
machen”. A woman coming to a strange house full of strange people and secrets that
all conspire against her. It would then be really cool to hang it all up on a
Freudian plot like “Spellbound”. Very hot at the time and a perfect device for
making seemingly normal people do crazy and frightening things. But the
production should be really dark, something like “Cat People” or “I Walked With
a Zombie” to really get people out on the edge of the seat. Yeah, that would be
so cool.
Fortunately
for Lang “Secret Beyond the Door” turned out very good. It works, at least in
the sense of creating a frightening and suspenseful ambience. There is far
between older suspense movies that really work for me, I am just a jaded 21st
movie fan who is used to think that effective suspense requires the boom of an
approaching T-Rex or the possibility of a strange girl suddenly appearing in an
elevator. But “Secret…” really found me on the edge of the proverbial seat. For
scenes like Celia (Joan Bennett) discovering the dark secrets of the Lamphere
mansion I can forgive Lang a lot. To discover the scene of your own death on a
thundering, dark night is quite a mouthful for Celia and that feeling is
transmitted directly and undiluted to us. Lang was always a talented
expressionist moviemaker, but rarely as effective as here. I am sure he had
been watching some of Jacques Tourneur’s work as well.
If you want
to do a remake, you better try to make it better than the original or not at
all.
I suppose there
was an entire theme going on in the 40’ies with women coming to a new place
only to find that they are very much alone in a strange and terrifying place.
It was just come il faux. A difference here is that Celia is a much tougher
girl than her predecessors. Joan Bennett is making her a far more mature woman
than Joan Bennett was in “Rebecca” and more resolute than Ingrid Bergman’s
Paula in “Gaslight”. In some ways she reminds me of Betsy in “I Walked With a
Zombie”, not least because of her narration.
Celia is a highly
eligible heiress vacationing in Mexico when she meets Mark Lamphere (Michael
Redgrave). He is apparently a successful architect and due to some magical
chemistry between them they fall in love and get married in a rush. She knows
very little of him and we all know what that means: There are skeletons in the
closet. He soon start to act weirdly as some events seems to be triggering a
different and colder persona. He is like a pendulum swinging between the loving
and caring husband and the cold and hostile stranger (who said Dr. Jekyll and
Mr. Hyde?) and Celia is responding by doubting if this marriage thing is really
such a good idea.
The Lamphere
mansion is Lang’s Manderley. It is gloomy and stuffed with odd characters.
There is Marks dominating sister Caroline (Anne Revere) and Mark’s secretary Miss
Robey (Barbara O'Neil), a character who has not a little in common with Mrs.
Danvers. And then there is Mark’s son David. Whoops, I guess he forgot to
mention that to Celia before they tied the knot. Mark also had a previous wife
who died and whose death he is still blaming himself for. Does that sound
familiar?
Under a
very thin surface everybody seems at odds with each other in the house. David
is a really weird boy who walks around with an accusing finger pointed toward
Mark (He killed my mother!) Robey is like a ghost secretly in love with Mark
and clinging on to her position using guilt as a weapon (She saved David as a
child) and Caroline is bossing everybody around. Not the most comfortable place
in the world.
All this
takes a serious turn for the worse during a house warming party where Mark is
encouraged to tour the guests through a series of reconstructed famous rooms,
Marks hobby. Mark happily obliges and tells how each room was the scene of a
famous murder. It is gruesome, macabre and not a little disturbing. What the
hell is going on here? Celia is seriously shaken and frankly I found it a bit
hard to believe that Mark and his guests would find such a series of rooms
appropriate. Mark is clearly not normal in the head and what is in that
mysterious seventh room that Mark insists on keeping locked up?
The
following part is the best segment of the movie, but also a part I should not reveal
too much from. Suffice to say that Celia HAVE to find out what is in the room
and is not too happy with what she finds there.
As I
already mentioned the entire film hangs on Freudian psychoanalysis. Mark has
some repressed trauma from his childhood relating to his mother (of course) and
that makes him behave in a psychotic manner, in this case giving him an urge to
kill. He thinks he already did kill and the guilt just compounds the psychosis.
Now, since this is a Freudian story Mark, like Anthony Edwardes in “Spellbound”
just needs to be confronted with the events in his childhood and he will
essentially snap out of his mental illness.
Hollywood
loved Freud. Freudian psychoanalysis was a way to disarm an insane murderer and
produce a happy ending without too much complication. A silver bullet so to
speak. It is also a pile of horse shit psychobabble that trivializes something
which is immensely more complicated in reality.
So, where
does “Secret Beyond the Door” land? Yes, it is a total rip off, yes we have
seen most of it before, yes, the Freudian psychobabble makes me gag, but damn,
this is an effective film! It works, goddammit, and for that I can forgive Herr
Lang a lot. Okay, this is not “M”, but I did for my part enjoy this movie.
We'll disagree on this one in part. I agree that the Freudian crap is laughable and that it's a complete rehash of other, better films. I don't find it effective at all. Just silly.
ReplyDeleteAh, well, the ending did no good for me, but I am getting used to those silly resolutions. I am mostly focussing on the middle part and for me that worked very well.
DeleteI haven't seen this one yet. I need to try it out. Somehow I doubt that it will get me to forgive the List makers for leaving Lang's Scarlet Street and/or The Woman in the Window off the list in favor of this.
ReplyDeleteI never saw those so I can not say if the list botched it up. In the case of Secret beyond the Door, they definitely went for the style and technical execution, which is top mark.
DeleteI am laughing at how similar our reviews are, right down to referencing Rebecca and Spellbound right off the back. Fabulous!
ReplyDeleteI love your description as the Freudian psychobabble as a "silver bullet," because yes, exactly! That's precisely what Hollywood thought of Freud, that somehow simply being confronted with your buried trauma was enough to magically erase all mental illness and issues. It's so so SO silly.
Yet very stylish. Nothing if not stylish.
Nice review!!!
Thank you very much!
DeleteTo some extent I suppose this is a no-brainer. The rip-off screams to heaven and the freudian resolution is just immensely stupid. What remain is the style and the suspense. To me it works. That is not the case for everybody.
So, which is more important? I do not know and that is why I am on the fence with this movie.